tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-52320012243458416.post8060706973559813620..comments2007-08-16T11:43:59.741-07:001001 noisy camerashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10296123143499134309noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-52320012243458416.post-3093647993018550042007-08-16T11:43:00.000-07:002007-08-16T11:43:00.000-07:00Thanks for your comments! The Internet has indeed changed things up, and most of the print magazines have been struggling on how to adapt.1001 noisy camerashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10296123143499134309noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-52320012243458416.post-80549034245790309022007-08-15T20:12:00.000-07:002007-08-15T20:12:00.000-07:00I have been reading this magazine for so many years that the twenty five years ago feature seems almost like yesterday.<BR/>Before the maturity of the web and sites like Dpreview photo magazines were must haves to keep up with technology and prices, now I am not sure of the point of these magazines except for the addicted in a non web situation.<BR/>I still subscribe to Pop Photo and get a good half hour of commute reading from each issue and will remain a subscriber until death do us part.<BR/>The high point of Pop Photo in my opinion and memory was the cover photo by Peter Gowland of a model wearing the Rudi Gernreich topless swimsuit, now that was photography. Today for some reason we get no cheesecake just softcore camera fetishism. <BR/>The difference between the softcore approach of Pop Photo and the hardcore of Dpreview is the measure of relevance to the reader.Richard Alan Foxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00770875869754360410noreply@blogger.com